Microstructure Effects on Hydrogen Embrittlement in Austenitic Steels: A Multidisciplinary Investigation

Fig.1: Detecting hydrogen on a 50×50 µm² surface area of a H charged austenitic steel after evaporation of a 100 nm Pd film. a) A topographic image obtained by AFM indicates austenitic (due to surface preparation topographically higher) and ferritic (lower, i.e., darker) regions. b) and c) Potential maps of this area obtained after 28 h and 44 h in the Kelvin probe mode. Above the austenites the potential decreases faster than above the ferrites due to the larger amount of stored hydrogen. The dark spots in b)-c) indicate sites with especially high hydrogen concentrations (traps).
© Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH
 grain boundary in fcc iron. The minimum energy path for a diffusion in a (1-10) / (113) plane perpendicular / parallel to the boundary is indicated by white dots. In the upper part the corresponding energies along the same path are plotted.](/3746593/original-1518437952.jpg?t=eyJ3aWR0aCI6MjQ2LCJvYmpfaWQiOjM3NDY1OTN9--3f061f539ff19f33b1486b801ef42a42a02850e0)
Fig. 2: Potential energy surface for a single H interstitial next to a Σ11[1-10](113) grain boundary in fcc iron. The minimum energy path for a diffusion in a (1-10) / (113) plane perpendicular / parallel to the boundary is indicated by white dots. In the upper part the corresponding energies along the same path are plotted.
© Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH

Fig. 3: ECCI micrograph for the crack propagation in Fe–18Mn–1.2C austenitic steel. The cracks initiate at a grain boundary, where deformation twins are intercepting. The crack propagation afterwards continues along the deformation twins.
© Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH
In preparation
Hydrogen-induced cracking at grain and twin boundaries in an Fe–Mn–C austenitic steel
Scripta Materialia 66 (2012), 459-462