Contact

Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Gerhard Dehm
Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Gerhard Dehm
Director

Phone: +49 211 6792 217

More information

2.
T. Meiners, T. Frolov, R. E. Rudd, G. Dehm, C. H. Liebscher
Observations of grain boundary phase transformations in an elemental metal.

Publication

Seeing how grain boundaries transform in a metal

Max-Planck-scientists prove the existence of phase transformations in grain boundaries and publish their results in Nature

March 19, 2020

Grain boundaries are one of the most prominent defects in engineering materials separating different crystallites, which determine their strength, corrosion resistance and failure. Typically, these interfaces are regarded as quasi two-dimensional defects and controlling their properties remains one of the most challenging tasks in materials engineering. However, more than 50 years ago the concept that grain boundaries can undergo phase transformations was established by thermodynamic concepts, but they have not been considered, since they could not be observed. Dr. Christian Liebscher, head of the group “Advanced Transmission Electron Microscopy” and his team members at the Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung (MPIE), now found a way to directly observe grain boundary transitions experimentally. With colleagues from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), USA, who modelled the grain boundary transformations, the researchers published their recent findings in Nature.

Their results are surprising: “The search for congruent transformations has all the aspects of a search for a needle in a 6+C dimensional haystack.”[1] This quote by John W. Cahn, material scientist and expert for thermodynamics, describes the complexity of experimentally proofing their existence and the team of MPIE and LLNL even found two of these “needles”. The key was to utilize the atomic resolution microscopes at the MPIE to directly visualize the transforming interfaces. “We did not expect that we will see grain boundary phase transformations but our results clearly show that two grain boundary motifs coexist with different atomic arrangements. However, the grain boundary plane orientation, crystallite misorientation and chemical composition does not change. Through these observations we have to re-think how interfaces behave while exposing a material to temperature and/or stress”, explains Liebscher. He and his colleagues analysed thin films of pure copper particularly by atomic resolved transmission electron microscopy. This way, they unlocked the grain boundary phases and proofed their coexistence with atomic precision. The phases can be atomistically described as motifs with pearl and domino-shaped structure (see Fig. 1). Dr. Timofey Frolov and Dr. Robert Rudd, from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, modelled the grain boundary phases. They used a novel grain boundary structure search algorithm, which is capable of finding the experimentally observed structures. Moreover, their finite-temperature molecular dynamics simulations explore the transformation kinetics. The predicted structures not only perfectly resemble the experimental observations, but demonstrate that the grain boundary phases can transform into each other by changing temperature or stress. Additionally, the simulations indicate that the grain boundary phase junction, a novel line defect which has not been considered previously, is rate controlling. “We discovered by modelling that the speed of the transformation largely depends on the migration of the phase junction. It takes only a few tens of nanoseconds in case of a short defect to complete the transformation from the domino to the pearl structure. Whereas no transformation is observed when the defect length exceeds a few nanometres and takes place below 500 K.”, explains Dr. Thorsten Meiners, first author of the publication and former doctoral researcher at the MPIE. Furthermore, the grain boundary phases are characterized by different properties, which determine how the interface phases move, how they take up impurity elements or how they mechanically deform.

Fig. 1: Atomic resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) image of a grain boundary phase transformation in elemental copper. The corresponding grain boundary phases are predicted by grain boundary structure search. The dynamics of the grain boundary phase transformation as observed in experiment is modelled by molecular dynamics simulations. Zoom Image
Fig. 1: Atomic resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) image of a grain boundary phase transformation in elemental copper. The corresponding grain boundary phases are predicted by grain boundary structure search. The dynamics of the grain boundary phase transformation as observed in experiment is modelled by molecular dynamics simulations. [less]

“Hence, understanding how grain boundaries transform provides a new view on still unexplained material phenomena, such as abnormal grain growth, and paves new ways to consider interface transitions as a material design element”, states Prof. Gerhard Dehm, director at the MPIE. The different states of grain boundaries or interfaces can have a strong impact on the corrosion behaviour of materials, how they behave under catalytic conditions or even play an important role in the failure of microelectronic devices. The scientists aim to widen the current observations to experiments done at different temperatures, under stress and in the presence of impurities. The aim is to establish a complete understanding of these phase transformations, thus being able to design material properties by reaching out to a holistic grain boundary engineering. This research was mainly financed through the ERC Advanced Grant GB-CORRELATE (Grant Agreement 787446) of Prof. Gerhard Dehm.

1.
T. Meiners, T. Frolov, R. E. Rudd, G. Dehm, C. H. Liebscher
Observations of grain boundary phase transformations in an elemental metal.
Author: Yasmin Ahmed Salem

[1] John W. Cahn, German American material scientist and expert in the field of thermodynamics, in: Transitions and phase equilibria among grain boundary structures. Journal de Physique 12 (43) 1982, p. 208

 
loading content
Go to Editor View